Most of your year goes to the funds you decline.
That is the part nothing helps with.

What arrives

One page you can hand to your investment committee.

Not a summary. A reading, with its sources attached.

Every figure names its page

A TVPI you cannot click through to page fourteen is a TVPI we do not print. Where the deck is ambiguous about net versus gross, the card says unverified rather than choosing for you.

Fit against your own mandate

Strategy, stage, geography, cheque size, and pacing — measured against the mandate you wrote, not a generic score. Where a fund trips one of your hard excludes, that is the first thing you read.

Your existing exposure

What this fund would overlap with in the book you already hold. This one is computed from your data alone, so it works on your first day, before any peer has said anything.

Pacing, against real forecasts

What this commitment would do to your budget, and when the calls are likely to land — projected from your own history and from how comparable funds have actually drawn. Where there is not enough history, it says so instead of drawing a straight line.

The habit

Clear forty inbounds without opening a tab.

Your address answers to three verbs. Forward and act in one motion, from the phone, between meetings.

you+pass@lp.gpPass

A short decline goes out under your own name, threaded to the original, with a reason the GP can actually use. Drafted for your approval until you have sent ten without editing them — and where your mandate does not make the reason obvious, it asks you rather than inventing one.

you+watch@lp.gpWatch

Filed without a reply. When a later deck shows the fund has held a close, moved its terms or lost a founding partner, it comes back in the digest at 07:30 your time — and only then. We do not invent news about a fund nobody has sent us anything new about.

you+dd@lp.gpDiligence

Opens the file: full extraction, overlap against your book, and peer references where enough allocators have contributed to show them.

Written first

We published the constraints before we held anyone’s data.

Ten clauses, versioned in public. Any material change takes sixty days’ notice and gives you termination, full export and a pro-rata refund — as does any breach of it, immediately. Each clause names the file that enforces it, so the promise and the mechanism can be read together.

• We do not sell, license, rent or share identifiable customer data.
• We do not compete with you. No placement, no brokerage, no carry.
• Your pipeline is yours. Our staff cannot read it except on your written, per-incident request — and every such access appears in your own audit trail.
• A GP never learns that a particular allocator is looking at them.
• Nothing is shown that rests on fewer than 5 organizations.
• References are structured, never free text, and attributed to no one.
• No model is trained on your data, by us or by anyone we use.
• You can leave with everything, self-service, on any plan.
• Your data is held in the European Union.
• An independent review against these clauses every year, published in full — including the findings.

Where this is weak

For a while, the peer column will be mostly empty.

A network is worth nothing until enough of the right people are in it, and we would rather be plainly useless to you for a season than useful on a number drawn from three organizations. So we open one segment at a time and stay shut until that segment is dense enough to mean something.

Everything that works from your own data — the extraction, the mandate fit, the exposure overlap, the pacing, the declines — works from the first message you forward. The peer column fills in behind it.